Looking at those numbers, I think the comparison is between apples and oranges. There are some things that stick out to me.įilament Used (these are from my slices): I will do a print with cura too, just to check how "off" the estimates are. I did print the creality sliced slug and that was 5:16 in actual print time, so that closes the gap with one hour. Combing Its not easy to compare settings in those two, because Creality do have fewer settings. I'm not able, however, to find Jerk and Acceleration in creality. Changing it to "all" did not do any difference. It was set to "all" in creality and "not in skin" in cura. I sort of stumbled upon that analyser in the search for an explanation here □ I found the combing settings in creality after your tip to check the menues. There are many settings that affect retractions. I guess I would concentrate on the retractions. Did you play with "combing"? combing will reduce retractions and save time. Did you put the correct values in for acceleration and jerk and such? I think you can get those values possibly out of the menu system on the creality? Is it accurate for your printer? I find that these time estimates can be off by 2X because you may have the wrong value somewhere.Īnyway the slower print has twice as many retractions - that is the key difference I think. Wow - that "gcode analyser" is very cool.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |